Home page Tourists page Investors page Citizens page South Africans Abroad page      Südafrika auf einen Blick   L’Afrique du Sud en un coup d’oeil Fri, 06 Oct 2006
Essential Information
  About South Africa
       Animals and plants
       Arts and culture
     more  Democracy
       Education
       Geography and climate
       Government
       Health care
       History and heritage
       Media
       People
       Science and technology
       Social development
       Sport
       Sustainable development
  South Africa map
  SA photo galleries
  SA web directory
  Site map
Public Services
  Advice for citizens
  Advice for foreigners
  South Africans abroad
Doing business
  Economy
  Investing in South Africa
  Trade with South Africa
  Trends & Growth
  Business news
Plan a trip
  Holiday experiences
  Smart travel tips
What's happening
  News and features
  Arts and entertainment
  Conferences and expos
  Sport
Special Features
  2010 Fifa World Cup SA
  Gateway to Africa
  Nelson Mandela
  South African Women


Weather

South African Weather Service


Quick forecasts
SA Weather Service

South Africa Map
South African Map

Find your way
on our interactive
macro-to-micro South Africa map



No sex for sale, Court rules

10 October 2002

The Constitutional Court has ruled that prostitution and running brothels are still illegal. The ruling, made on Wednesday, dashed the hopes of brothel owner Ellen Jordan, who spent millions of rands in her court bids to get the laws thrown out.

When Jordan, one of her employees and a sex worker were arrested for contravening the Sexual Offences Act of 1957 in 1996, Jordan took the case to the High Court. The High Court found firstly that sections of the law that render sex for money a crime were unconstitutional, and secondly that the legislation outlawing the managing of brothels should be upheld.

Jordan took the rulings to the Constitutional Court to have the first one confirmed and the second overturned.

However, the Constitutional Court upheld both rulings, the first outlawing prostitution, the second outlawing and brothel-keeping. The Court found that outlawing prostitution did not infringe on the rights to human dignity and economic activity.

Judges in the Court were however divided over whether the ban on prostitution amounts to gender discrimination or not.

Sexual double standards
One judge, Sandile Ngcobo, arguing the majority position, said that the ban did not discriminate against women in particular, since both male and female prostitution is illegal.

However, judges Kate O’Regan and Albie Sachs argued that by making the prostitute the main offender and the client the accomplice, the law “reinforces sexual double standards and perpetuates gender stereotypes in a manner impermissible in a society committed to advancing gender equality”, according to a Constitutional Court summary of the judgement.

There were mixed reactions to the judgement, with some arguing that the ruling would consolidate efforts to close down brothels, and others maintaining that the ruling would not curb prostitution but would simply send it further underground, rendering any attempts to regulate the industry and improve the health and safety of sex workers more difficult.

According to the Star newspaper, National Director of Public Prosecutions Bulelani Ngcuka was pleased with the judgement and warned brothels to “Close down, or we will do it for you”.

Spread of HIV/Aids
Doctors for Life International, called by the state as a witness, argued that prostitution “encouraged international trafficking in women, led to child prostitution, intensified the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, especially HIV/Aids, and was often accompanied by a high degree of drug abuse”, The Star reported.

However, some have cautioned that the ruling will send the industry even further underground, without curbing it at all. The director of the Reproductive Health Research Unit, Helen Rees, said that the ruling would make it difficult to help protect sex workers against risks like HIV/Aids. “How to you access (sex workers) when you criminalise them?” she asked.

The Commission on Gender Equality also expressed disappointment over the judgement.

SouthAfrica.info reporter

Print this page Send this article to a friend



The answer is 'No' (Photo: Sex Worker Education & Advocacy Taskforce)

  • SA's push for gender equity
  • Commission on Gender Equality
  •  Constitutional Court
  •  Sex Worker Education & Advocacy Taskforce
  •  Reproductive Health Research Unit
  • CONSTITUTIONAL COURT UPDATE
  • Moseneke joins Constitutional Court
  • Court 'no' to ANC floor-crossers
  • No sex for sale, Court rules
  • Court says yes to floor-crossing




  • South African Tourism Wines of South Africa Proudly South African South Africa Government Online South African Broadcasting Corporation Department of Trade and Industry South Africa South African Airways JSE Securities Exchange
    Home | Tourists | Investors | Citizens | South Africans Abroad Site Map | South Africa Map | SA Web Directory | SA Photo Galleries
    Design, contents, site maintenance: Big Media Publishers (Pty) Limited
    Queries about the site? Contact the webmaster
    Published for the International Marketing Council of South Africa.
    Reliance on the information this website contains is at your own risk.
    Please read our Terms and Conditions of Use.